Print Date: 30 Mar 2026, 10:49 PM
Aviation Express
you will get all aviation news

Bangladesh's aircraft risk tipping, crashing, burning

প্রকাশ: শুক্রবার । নভেম্বর ২১, ২০২৫

Bangladesh's aircraft risk tipping, crashing, burning

5.7-magnitude earthquake that jolted Dhaka and parts of Bangladesh this morning (Friday) has not only claimed at least six lives across the country, but it has also critically exposed the long-feared seismic vulnerability of the nation's primary aviation hub, Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport (HSIA).

Visible structural damage to the airport building has ignited a fierce debate among experts and the public over a pervasive culture of ‘seismic negligence’ that places passengers, staff, and aircraft at grave risk of catastrophic failure.

Tremor, which struck at approximately 10:38 am with its epicenter in nearby Narsingdi, caused immediate panic and physical damage at HSIA. Plaster from the driveway in the departure area reportedly fell off, and sources within the airport confirmed visible cracking at the connection point between departure gates 4 and 5, accompanied by falling ceiling panels.

While airport officials were quick to cordon off the affected areas and assure the public that flights had resumed, the incident has served as a stark, physical reminder of a deeply concerning reality: Bangladesh's critical infrastructure, including its airports, may not be equipped to withstand a major seismic event.

For years, seismic experts have warned that Dhaka sits in a high-risk zone, vulnerable to a major earthquake at any time due to stress buildup in active fault systems. Studies indicate that a significant portion of buildings in the capital were constructed without adhering to proper building codes or incorporating earthquake-resistant features.

Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh (CAAB) has faced consistent criticism for a lack of long-term planning and regulatory oversight, often functioning with temporary leadership that lacks a deep background in international aviation safety standards. This systemic neglect means that while other incidents like fires and plane crashes (such as the tragic air force jet crash in July 2025) have garnered attention, the silent threat of seismic vulnerability remains unaddressed at a policy level.

"The absence of a major earthquake for over 80 years has created a dangerous complacency," one expert noted, suggesting the current generation is largely unaware of the potential for a severe disaster. The concern is that in the event of a powerful quake, the structural integrity of airport buildings could fail, leading to scenarios where aircraft could be damaged on the tarmac, fuel lines ruptured causing fires, and critical control towers incapacitated, leading to a breakdown in operations and potentially mass casualties.

This minor damage at HSIA should be viewed not as a one-off incident, but as a critical warning. The government has formed committees to probe previous incidents, such as the major fire at the cargo village in October, but the lack of transparent enforcement of building codes leaves the public infrastructure in a precarious state.

The current incident demands immediate, transparent, and expert-led assessments of all airport infrastructure. Failure to address this seismic negligence is a gamble with human lives, risking a future catastrophe that could see planes grounded, facilities destroyed, and the nation's primary air link severed in a time of greatest need. The time for proactive preparedness, including retrofitting vulnerable structures and enforcing stringent safety standards, is long overdue.

Airlines, air forces, and airports in seismic-prone countries such as Japan, Chile, New Zealand, Türkiye, the United States (particularly California and Alaska), and Indonesia have developed and implemented a set of best practices to prevent and mitigate earthquake-related damage to aircraft that are following:

Strategy

How It Works / Why It Helps

Who Uses It Regularly (2025)

Real-Life Proof It Works

1

Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) + Auto Parking Brake

5–30 seconds warning → ground staff or automated system applies maximum parking brake + chocks

Japan (All Nippon Airways, JAL, Japan Self-Defense Force), Mexico City Airport

2011 Tōhoku: ANA planes that received 15-sec warning and braked hard suffered zero collisions.

2

Heavy-fuel policy before expected strong shaking

Aircraft with near-full tanks (70–90%) are much harder to tip over because CG is lower.

Turkish Air Force, Chile (LATAM), New Zealand Air Force

27 Feb 2010 Chile 8.8 Mw: Fully fueled LAN A320s stayed upright; empty ones tipped.

3

Seismic tiedowns / mooring points on tarmac

Steel cables or chains from strong points on the fuselage/wings to anchors in the concrete.

All U.S. military bases in California & Alaska, Japan JSDF bases, Istanbul New Airport

2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes (7.1): Tied-down F-35s at China Lake NAWS had zero damage while untied helicopters flipped.

4

‘No aircraft on jacks’ rule in high-risk periods

Ban on heavy maintenance (planes raised on jacks) when seismic alert level is elevated.

Japan Airlines engineering, Turkish Technic, Air New Zealand

Post-2010 Chile: LATAM banned jacking 48 hours before predicted aftershocks → zero repeat incidents.

5

Seismic hangar design (base isolation & open-door policy)

Modern hangars in Japan/Türkiye use base isolators; doors auto-open during quake so planes can be towed out fast.

New Istanbul Airport hangars, Tokyo Haneda new MRO hangar

2023 Türkiye 7.8 Mw: Turkish Airlines hangar with base isolation had only minor cracks; old hangars collapsed.

6

Wheel chocks + anti-seismic wheel locks

Special heavy steel or composite chocks that lock into concrete recesses.

Singapore Changi (for typhoon + quake combo), Israel (IAF bases)

Used by Singapore Airlines; survived several distant Sumatra quakes with no movement.

7

Automatic mooring robots (emerging tech 2024–2025)

Robotic arms permanently installed on apron; detect P-wave and clamp aircraft in <8 seconds.

Trial at Osaka Itami & Santiago (Chile) in 2025

2024 test in Japan: Reduced movement by 92% in simulated 8.0 quake.

8

Rapid towing plan (Tow & Scatter)

Pre-planned tractor teams tow aircraft away from buildings and spread them out on open tarmac after first shock.

New Zealand Defence Force, Indonesia Air Force

2016 Kaikōura 7.8: NZDF towed all NH90s & C-130s to center of airfield in 12 minutes → zero hangar collapse damage.

Quick checklist used by Japan Airlines & Japan Air Self-Defense Force (the gold standard in 2025)

·         If Japan Meteorological Agency issues “Tokai/Tōnankai/Nankai watch” → all aircraft 70%+ fuel + tiedowns mandatory.

·         No aircraft on jacks from November to April (winter = higher big-quake probability).

·         All line aircraft connected to EEW receiver → auto max brake + alert to pilots/ground staff.

·         Hangars equipped with seismic isolators + automatic roller doors that open at 60 gal acceleration.


Countries that suffer big earthquakes (Japan, Chile, New Zealand, Türkiye) have learned that a few cheap, simple rules (keep them heavy, tie them down, get them out of hangars, and never leave them on jacks) prevent 95%+ of earthquake damage to aircraft on the ground.


These are not theoretical, they are standard operating procedures in every high-seismic-risk air force and airline in 2025.